Tuesday, February 24, 2009

more abuse of authority from the NYPD



In the video above this dude gets "Rodney King'ed" by the NYPD...

This is complete abuse of power, and unjustifiable... what sickens me the most is the one pig just standing there who could have stepped in to deal with the excessive force of the officer. The officer that is on the ground with the dude also could have prevented the abuse.

Now many pigs are posting on message boards, and elsewhere about this video claiming that the use of force was necessary or justified. Now I do not know about you, but if I was the guy getting my ass beat with a baton it would be rather difficult to roll onto my stomach and put my hands behind my back. My one and only concern at that moment would be survival, and attempting to lessen the impact of the pain inflicted by the blows of the baton, which is what I see in the video. The man seems that he is not trying to fight with the officers, but his survival instincts kicked in, and he is attempting to keep from being hit, or at least lessen the pain inflicted from the baton.

So we see how the pigs operate... and while it would be nice to see justice done to this officer by another piece of hardware on his police belt, just understand when dealing with pigs face to face try to be as professional and respectful as possible. Not every interaction with the police is on video tape some where. Most Police interactions that are video tapped are done by the police, so it can not be used as evidence to prove your case (you don't think that if the cops filmed this that the tape would not have disappeared somewhere?) With out this video the man being beaten senseless by the police was facing a 15 year jail sentence for assaulting an officer, now hopefully he will settle a nice lawsuit with the city (hopefully not where the city gets away with not having to admit to any wrong doing)

****As always.... while I can see where violence could be called for in some situations I do not condone, endorse, promote, encourage, or suggest any violent actions... please review the disclaimer to the right..*****

All writings are educational, editorial, and / or fictional in nature.....

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Dumb bitch upset it cost more to clean womens clothing.

RELATED ARTICLE

This dumb bitch has got nothing better to do then to go around and do price comparison between how much a cleaner charges for mens shirts as opposed to womens shirts to be laundered.

The cleaners gave her the reason for the difference in pricing, but she was not satisfied. She will not be satisfied until the cost of cleaning men shirts rises to the cost of women shirts. If she believes that the outcome would be the reduction of the cost of womans shirts, she is fucking delusional.

Thanks for helping to bring prices UP for the guys. Someone needs to lock this bitch back up in her cage.

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Freedom of speech? Nope, NJ police arrest news cameraman

RELATED ARTICLE

The oppressors of freedom have arrested a news cameraman who was filming a peaceful demonstration on a public city street.

This was a professional journalist, and the television station CBS 2 will be fighting his "disorderly conduct" charges. Imagine if it was a normal citizen attempting to document and video tape this.
RELATED ARTICLE

I can not believe this. A 3 year old wanders out of the home in the middle of the night, then is found dead 1/2 a mile away frozen to death. And the police claim that no foul play was involved!!

How does a 3 year old child climb out of there crib, open the bedroom door, walk through the entire house to the front door, unlock the door and open it, then open the screen door, and go for a 1/2 mile walk.... in the darkness of the night??

None of this makes sense, yet the parents claim the child got out and wandered once before, but was found after a short search. If this is the case that the child had gotten out once before, then better precautions should have been taken.

I for one can not believe that the child exited the crib with out problem, and with out making lots of noise, or injuring itself. I also can not believe that a 3 year old can reach the door knob, yet alone have the strength to turn the dead bolt, or unlock and open the door. I also can not believe that the child would venture out into the freezing cold when there was heat on in the home. And Finally, I can not believe that freezing, in only a diaper and t-shirt, the infant was able to travel for 1/2 a mile. That is a rather far distance to cover, especially by such a young child. (aprox. equal to 10 city blocks)

Salary cap for government hand outs

RELATED ARTICLE

I completely disagree with the government giving hand outs to corporations. If you mismanaged your business, and are in a poor financial situation, it is your own businesses fault. With that said, I think that it is the responsible thing to do is to require CEOs to cut there own pay to find money for there corporations before going to the government for a hand out. I think that $500,000 is a reasonable cut off for a CEO salary if he wants to accept a government hand out with all of our tax money. Shit, it is 10 times more than the average middle class worker's salary, and 20 times more than what many American workers make. I do not see how someone could not afford to live rather nicely for that much money. I really do not see the need for a salary above that, especially if you are claiming you are broke, and your company needs money.

Also bonuses are supposed to be distributed based on a companies performance, they should not be automatic. If a company is doing poorly, there should be no bonuses, and bail out funds should never fund a bonus. If you need a bail-out, then there is no reason for you to have bonuses, as your company finances are in trouble, and you are not likely making money.

The linked article is full of shit, complaining that the $500,000 salary cap is going to cause problems because 12% of tax dollars comes from wall street, and that they should be able to make whatever and still collect tax payers bail out funds.

People must not realise that this bail out money has to come from somewhere, its not like they just created it from no where, it is tax payers money. Granted, they likely just printed some new money off, or just invented more money, but that in turn is going to have an effect on the currency in circulation. It will dramaticllay reduce the value of the money that is in circulation. Be on the look out for huge inflation in the near future, while wages continue to decline.

Crash landing pilot concerned about overdue library book

RELATED ARTICLE

Sure he is concerned about an overdue library book, he must have seen the story about the chick who was arrested for not returning her library book. You can read more about it on my blog HERE
related article

You are fucking kidding me right?

click the link and scroll thru the story first, then come back to me....

This lady is one of the "neediest cases"?? She worked in journalism, perhaps that is why her story is in the "paper" (at least the online edition) She did not get her college diploma until last January, and she is 55. Not that I am a big believer in college being as important as real world experience, but for non-physical, or non-trade jobs, it helps set you apart.

By the tine you are 55, you have lived in diffrent parts of the world, experienced diffrent jobs... but you are a lazy fuck! The economy was not fucked in 2006 while you were unemployed, and working part time. Now is the time that you choose to get back to work? If I was an employer I would pass you over, no need to even bother looking into your qualifications after reading that article.

1. you have shit for savings at 55
2. you just now choose to get around to getting your diploma
3. you supported Hillary, but ended up voting for Obama, and since you are both black, he owes you something. You want him to address YOU? he owes you nothing
4. you have either been unemployed, or worked only part time from 2006 to now
5. your degree is for film and media studies, but the last time you worked in a job even remotely in that field was 1991, 18 years ago!
6. your longest running job in the article is 10 years as market research, so you basically know how to give people surveys.

Not to be mean or anything, but we are all fucked... I just got a $600/mo pay cut, so I am making less just my essential bills are... there are many of us out there, and I can not feel sorry for someone who does not make a hustle, then at 55 decides that the world owes them

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

did it come as a suprise to anyone that the NYPD is racist?

RELATED ARTICLE

I have seen first hand how racist cops in NY can be. As a juvenile when they took a rubber band gun from me that was in my waist band, they said something to the effect "what if one of these monkeys saw you with that and thought it was real." And another time while I was at the 63 prescient as a juvenile for expressing my first amendment rights of saying "fuck the police" while flipping the bird to the cops, I heard a bitch pig discussing her evening plans that she was going to some Chinese reggae place to "...see a bunch of chinks dance around like niggers." Then there was this one Chinese cop, who me and my friend became friendly with. He rode alone in a car that was unsafe. Broken tail light, and many other mechanical problems. He said if just one more thing was wrong with the car, they would take it off the road for good. I doubt the white cop would be driving that car.

These are just some of my first hand experiences with the racism of the NYPD. Luckily I am white, and have not been on the receiving end of there racism. I feel sorry for those of you who are, and who have witnessed this first hand.

Good to see that not only did the city have to pay out $150,000, but that the responsible officer had to pay out $3,000 to each of the 3 accusers out of his pocket. I think though that the 3 officers will have difficulties in there career in the future, and doubt the $60,000 two of them got, or $30,000 the other got is worth the grief that they are to face in there remaining years with the PD.

Another thing is with all of these settlements no one has to admit to any wrong doing. If I was to ever be in the position where I had to sue someone, I would not ever want to accept any agreement where the responsible party did not have to accept responsibility for there actions. I would fight until an admission of guilt was publicly made.

Scumbag mayor threatens to fire 23,000 people

RELATED ARTICLE

BoldI guess this asshole still does not realise that everyone in this city is not a millionare or billionare! Most of us are working Joes, who live check to check, and have bills to pay, to companies owned by people like you with all the money.

23,000 people is a small city of people. What you are doing is going to turn people away from wanting to live, work and spend money in this city.

More than ever government workers are needed during economic crisis. We do not need less of anything! We need to maintain, or increase teaching staff, people need to be educated. The economy will eventually recover, and it be better that people get there education while in these bad times, then turn to other ways to occupy there time.

While the police can suck my ass, when times get bad crime rates have the potential to increase. While I do not think that there should be more police presence, or random searches, a solid police force, which respects the rights of the citizens is needed to maintain some sense of order. More so for overseeing that chaos does not break out, then to increase the caseload of the unjust court system.

Fire fighters are also very important in these times, as people at there breaking point may be more likely to torch there home or business for insurance fraud. People who still need to commute but can not longer afford there insurance may still continue to drive with out insurance, and when this happens, the likely hood of them stopping if in an accident is reduced, and the potential for additional injuries, or casualties increases. So they are also needed as first responders for these situations.

Sanitation workers are needed to maintain the cleanliness of the city. Lack of a functional sanitation department can lead to the spread of bacteria, and diseases. Street sweepers can however be scaled back, there are plenty of areas in the city where there is no alternate side parking, and the home owners are responsible for keeping the curb clean. This can be expanded, so that street sweepers are only used on major commercial roadways. This can save some money.

Medical staff should not be reduced either. With financial hardships comes the potential for additional spread of diseases, or illness. People may smoke more to calm there nerves, or relieve stress, causing an increase in smoking related illness. People may feel the need to prostitute them self to make ends meet, increasing the potential of STDs. People will not have sufficient funds for prevention, medication, etc. and will end up in hospitals with escalated needs.

Shit, I could keep going on in each section why we need not cut back. Oh, but here is somewhere that we can cut the fat. The MTA. Do we really need a subway train every 5 minutes or less on every single train line? Do we really need buses in Manhattan when there is a subway stop every block or two? I would love to do away with all busses, but I know that is not going to happen, but there are plenty of busses that are practicllay empty from the start of the route to the last stop.


Well, I am sure I have mentioned it in the past before, but in conclusion.... fuck you mr. Mike Bloomberg!!!

protectionism? sounds more like patriotism! BUY AMERICAN!!

RELATED ARTICLE

Some people still don't get it. People are still putting the full blame of the economy on the banking and mortgage industries. While they do have a major impact on the economy, the whole outsourcing, and free trade shit is what began the collapse of the economy.

I am sickened how the person who wrote the article continues to refer to "BUY AMERICAN" as "protectionism" and not patriotism, as it should be referred. We should take pride in the quality products and services that are available in our country. Products and services that are made, and performed within our boarders provide Americans with jobs. The more Americans who have jobs, the better it is for the economy.

I am sickened by seeing Toyota Prius'es being purchaced by government agencies. All government vehicles should always be made in America. What is even more sickening is American car companies making there cars in other countries. Many Fords, or GMs are made in Canada or Mexico. This is taking jobs away from Americans.

Look, there will always be the need to import and export raw materials and goods, but whenever and whereever possible we should look domesticllay before going outside of our country. Our labor laws are stronger, and our employees make living wage (in most cases). Our products quality are superior then products that are mass produced in third world countries, where the weekly, or monthly salary barely is what an hour of wages in the US is.

BUYING AMERICAN is the right thing, and patriotic thing to do, and more people should take a lesson from our elders, and those before us.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Some evidence to help debunk man-made global warming...

RELATED ARTICLE

A fossil of a tropical fresh water turtle was found in the Arctic. Proof that the Arctic was not always frozen, and had warm temperatures at least once in the Earths past.

Check the related article link above for the full story. This to me is PROOF that man-made global warming is no more than a myth, and that the warming and melting of the polar caps is a natural occurrence, and normal.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Spitzer swallows.

RELATED ARTICLE


I do not normally insert the full text of an article, but this one is kind of too short not to include the full article in the text.

A woman who helped run the prostitution ring that brought down former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer has been sentenced to six months in prison.

Cecil Suwal was sentenced Thursday by a federal judge in Manhattan.

Prosecutors had asked the judge to give the young madam around two years in prison for her role in managing the Emperors Club VIP escort service.

Her lawyer says she deserved leniency. The defense says she got involved in the business through a much older boyfriend who psychologically dominated her.

Suwal had pleaded guilty last spring to charges involving money laundering and promoting prostitution.

So the madam gets 6 months in jail, while Spitzer gets NO criminal charges. And he is not even required to register as a sex offender. He is one of the people who fought for stricter sex offender laws, and patronizing of a prostitute is a registrable sexual offense in the state of New York. So why is he allowed to walk free, with the only punishment him losing his public office, while this woman is forced to spend six months of her life behind the bars of a jail cell?

Dude dresses like chick to take test...

RELATED ARTICLE

SCHENECTADY, N.Y. – Dressing as a girl to take a high school Regents exam in place of another student landed a 17-year-old upstate New York boy in some serious detention. Deandre Ellis, 17, of Schenectady was arrested on a felony charge after the incident Tuesday. City school officials said a monitor verifying that each student was taking the proper exam suspected something was amiss when the name on the test and the person taking it didn't match.

Remember boys and girls, when cross dressing to impersonate someone else, use the person who you are trying to impersonates name!!! Fucking Idiot!!


Police said Ellis, who was released to probation authorities, was charged with burglary for entering the school to commit a crime. His public defender didn't immediately return a phone call or e-mail seeking comment.

First off he is a minor, only 17 years old. Secondly he did not steal or attempt to steal anything, so where did they come up with the determination that he should be charged with burglary? I can think of some charges that could be brought against him, but burglary is not one of them. Misrepresentation, providing false Identification (if he/she did provide ID), trespassing, etc.. I know there are laws that should cover most of those reasons.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Everything is not angry, heres something to make you laugh!

RELATED ARTICLE

This chick is suing Hawaiian Tropic because they did not want to hire her, according to her because of her accent, and her being ghetto.

I almost fell off the couch when I read this:

Morales, who said her dream job is to pour drinks while strutting her stuff in a bikini, returned to the Hawaiian Tropic Zone months later still in pursuit of a position.
And then there is this:

"It was kind of like my dream to work at the [Hawaiian Tropic Zone]," she said. "It's the bikini, I guess."
I guess she saw the other chicks suing the Hawaiian Tropic and decided that she wanted to get in on the suing action.


No more salt, if bloomberg has his way...

RELATED ARTICLE

This guy is full of shit, and I can not wait until he is out of office. First the guy doubles and triples parking violation fines. Not everyone is a millionaire Mr. Mike. Then he bans trans-fat, bans smoking in restaurants and bars, tries to get congestion pricing for anyone entering south of 60th street in Manhattan, and now this.

He wants food manufacturers, and restaurants to cut the amount of salt in there ingredients by 50%, by the next 10 years! Now, correct me if I am wrong but if the people making the food could reduce the amount of any one ingredient in there food, do you not think that they would do it? Cutting the salt content by 50% will also reduce the amount of salt purchased by these industries by 50% saving them money! The reason that the salt content is at the level that it is at, because that is what the public wants. That is what gives the food the taste that people come back for more. There are sodium free alternatives for those who wish to limit the amount of there salt intake, so people have a choice. People are not restricted to only eating high in salt foods, but there are alternatives that provide them with a choice. Perhaps George W. would be proud of your attempt at dictating what is best for the public.

It truly pisses me off that they play this off like they are concerned with the public's health, yet there is no universal health care! They are not paying the costs of any negative effects that might be caused by increased salt consumption. Perhaps if the government paid for your health care, then they might have more of a responsibility to require healthier foods, but until then, there is absolutely no reason why they should restrict the ability of people to choose what foods to eat, and weather they want to eat healthier or not.

Hey its Apu and Manjulia... IRL

RELATED ARTICLE

They just had octuplets , and they even look Indian, just like the simpsons... check out the link above...

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

People need to pay attention

RELATED ARTICLE

The article does not mention how old the home owner was, but the story is that there is a group of people posing as ConEd workers trying to gain access into homes in Staten Island.

This is complete bullshit. The home owner did not take the time to communicate with the person who answered the door. I believe that this was just an agent for one of the energy supplier companies, that do have agents that go from door to door to sign you up, so that they can lower your ConEd bill. I had one come to my door several months ago, and I switched to them. I have not really seen any savings, and am thinking of going back to ConEd completely, or finding another energy supplier.

"She said 'I'm from Con Ed and I'm trying to save you money on your rates,'" Chris Ditoro said.

I think that the person was not understood correctly. ConED would not send someone to your home to lower your rates, BUT a energy supply company would send an agent to your home to lower your ConEd bill.


Then the homeowner noticed a car with two strangers inside parked across the street.

"I realized this didn't seem right. The ID didn't seem like a Con Ed ID. She flashed it very quickly, something wasn't right about it," Ditoro said.
The home owner appears more paranoid then alert. At any given time anywhere in this city, there could be a car parked across the street from someones home with people who are unknown. There are over 3 million people in this city. This could have either just been a coincidence, or perhaps they were her transportation. The article did not mention if she left with them, just that the car was gone when she left. This could just have been coincidence. They were already in the car, how long are would they be sitting idling in the car with out leaving?

I do encourage everyone to be vigillant, and not to let people into there home if they did not call them to there home. You can speak with unsolicited visitors through the door, or outside the front door. Most large companies like ConEd, Verizon, National Grid, etc. have employee ID cards that they can show for proof of ID. Some smaller companies may not have employee ID cards. If you are concerned, contact the company that they are representing and verify that someone from the company needs access to your home.

Can we please get rid of this guy?

RELATED ARTICLE

Look I am getting tired of hearing stories about this asshole, and I think that it is time we forcefully remove him from office, and void out his choice as senator. We need to have emergency elections so that we can be rightfully represented by elected officials.

I am tired of hearing shit from, and about this asshole Patterson.

Paterson said he condemns all leaks, saying he informed his staff "about the importance of keeping information confidential."
Politicians should be transparent, especially while reviewing and considering appointing someone to a position that should be an ELECTED position!

Gov. Paterson vehemently denied today that he tossed mud at Caroline Kennedy - saying he "had nothing to do" with the smear campaign that dogged her days after pulling out of consideration for the state's vacant senate seat.

If you truly did not have anything to do with this, then you can just go on with business as usual. Continuing to be defensive about questions makes you appear even more guilty.

DTV delays

RELATED ARTICLE

The Senate passed a bill on Monday to delay the nationwide switch to digital TV signals, giving consumers nearly four more months to prepare.

The transition date would move to June 12 from February 17 under the bill that was fueled by worries that viewers are not technically ready for the congressionally-mandated switch-over.

Grandma will have another 4 months to get her DTV converter box. What a clusterfuck! I was hoping for the conversion to occur next month, It surely would have created a temporary source for additional income in setting up these DTV converters for the elderly, or technologicaly inept.

Broadcasters are moving from analog to digital signals to give public safety officials more spectrum, especially useful for emergencies, and to improve viewing quality.

Let's be honest with the public. The switch has to do with the auctioning of the spectrum to AT&T and Verizon for LOTS of money, and the spectrum will be used for 4G cellular technologies. Some may be set aside for public saftey, but for the most part, the old TV spectrum is going to be used for commercial purposes, and 4G wireless networks.

Guess he didn't see it comming

RELATED ARTICLE

Patterson is condemning leaks from someone in his administration about Caroline Kennedy.

This loser is looking more and more incompetent every day, and he is just appointing people that are even less competent then he is....

more climate change bullshit

RELATED ARTICLE

Many damaging effects of climate change are already basically irreversible, researchers declared Monday, warning that even if carbon emissions can somehow be halted temperatures around the globe will remain high until at least the year 3000.

If that is the case, then there is really no point in fucking with our quality of life.

I understand the need to reduce the amount of natural resources that we use, so that we can continue to have a source of energy well into the future. But to attempt to claim climate change is the reason that we need to be more efficient, that is pure bullshit. Even if there was a minute possibility that the carbon that we put into the environment has anything to do with climate change, if it is already too late, and the effects are irreversible for at least 1000 years, who the fuck cares... that's over 100 generations away! We have plenty of time to evolve....

Monday, January 26, 2009

If you want your child support payments, your going to have to pay

RELATED ARTICLE

While I am sure that there are many gold diggers out there who do not need the financial support that child support provides, there are many who rely on those payments for the most essential of things, like food, rent, and clothing.

I think that the financial situation should be resolved peacefully outside of the courtroom, however I do understand that there are times where this is not possible, and the court must get involved to ensure payments.

NY however is charging $25 for every $500 collected, from the RECIPIENT of the child support. This is unacceptable. Yes there is likely administrative costs associated with handling the payments, and no as a tax payer I should not be responsible to pay the bill, but neither should the recipient! The person making the payments should be responsible for making any payments for any administrative costs involved with the collection, and distribution, as well as the enforcement of any such payments. These administrative payments could be collected in several ways. They could be collected monthly, quarterly, or annually, but the financial responsibility should fall on the PAYEE. The fee should not exceed the actual costs for the administration of such payments, plus a small fee that would assist in costs associated with enforcement.

The amount of the child support payments should be reviewed on an annual basis, or when ever a major economic change effects one of the parties involved. The payment should be no more then a certain percentage of the payee's income, but at the same time, if the recipient is more financially secure then the payee, then that should also work to lower the burden on the payee.

Greedy corporations... especially Verizon....

RELATED ARTICLE

Well, as always due to personal experience, I as David take every legal means necessary to slay the Goliath of a giant Verizon.

They want to sell you a femocell device for $250 so that you can use YOUR internet connection that YOU pay for as a cell tower! Do they provide you with a discount on your minutes, for using your cell phone and internet connection as basically a VoIP phone? NOPE!

Instead of upgrading or maintaining there network, and cell towers, they are attempting to get YOU to pay for your own "mini cell tower" in your own home!

They even want you to place the device near a window "because it needs a GPS signal" instead of being truthful, and telling you, that they will use YOUR hardware that they require you to purchace, and YOUR internet connection that you pay for, to provide cellular reception to other cell phone users!

taken from http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/accessory?action=gotoSetup


Place Near a Window

  • Your Network Extender needs to be placed near a window that has a clear view to the sky to be able to access a GPS signal. If you cannot place the Network Extender near a window, an optional external antenna extender is included with purchase.
  • Network Extender has a range of up to a 5,000 square foot area.
  • Where a compatible cell tower is unavailable, callers that do not appear on your managed access list may access the Network Extender when not in use by priority callers. All callers may access the Network Extender for emergency (E911) calls.

na-na na na-na-na

RELATED ARTICLE

Take that all you smug, yuppie fucks, with your Crapple computers.... your shitty iMacs, iPods, and iPhones.....
One of the first major trojan worms that has been detected is circulating.

I am pulling my hair out about this "man-made" climate change bullshit!

RELATED ARTICLE

Obama is reversing some of the Bush policies on climate change.

First of all "man-made" climate change is complete bullshit! Secondly, he is allowing states to impose higher emission standards on vehicles then allowed by national law. Not only this, but he is also requiring that car companies produce more fuel efficient cars within the next 18 months.

The harsher laws are supposedly to combat the effects of climate change. How are you to effect climate change by harsher vehicle emission laws, when climate change is caused by sun spots, and water vapor in the upper atmosphere. They are also intended to reduce our dependency on foreign oil. There is a solution to reduce our dependency on foreign oil, and that is to use the oil that we have here in our own country, mostly in Alaska and Texas.

Harsher emission laws are going to force people who have older cars to purchace newer cars, as the older cars will not pass emissions controls at some point in the future. This will increase the demand for new car purchases, which should be a consumers decision, they should not be forced to purchace a new car if they do not feel the need, or if they can not afford to. This will also increase the pressure on the car manufacturers. They will have to spend more money on R&D to develop more fuel efficient engines. The fuel efficient engines will not produce the same power as current engines, and will cost the automakers more money. This will result in cutting the workforce to cut overhead, as well as find other areas to reduce the cost of manufacturing the vehicle. So you will end up with a cheaper quality car, for a higher cost.

Shared cab rides?

RELATED ARTICLE

OK, this sounds like a feasible idea. It should hopefully reduce the required amount of cabs on the city streets. It has the potential to increase the amount of money drivers make, while reducing the amount of gas being used for transporting the same amount of people. And there are sure to be many other benefits to a program like this.

However, what about people who are together? Will they be charged per passenger? As it is now, as long as your group of people fit into one taxi, you pay one fee regardless of how many people are in the cab. Also, what happens when you and a friend get into a cab, and make 2 drop offs. Currently, if you share a cab with a friend(s) and you travel to multiple destinations the fee is the same. Unless clarified, these people could be charged per person, or charged a higher rate for sharing a cab.

While the idea on the surface sounds good for the drivers, congestion, reduction of fuel consumption, etc. unless certain things are not addressed this has the potential to cause problems for those who use taxi's to get around the city.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Ford CEO tring to hold onto his salary...

RELATED ARTICLE

It is good to see that Ford has not come forward for any stimulus money, but I think the CEO's motivation is a little more sinister then he would like to project publicly.

Am I the only one who remembers that Ford's CEO publicly stated that if Ford took any stimulus money that he would work for $1 a year? Seems like motivation to not borrow any stimulus money by any means necessary, regardless of the outcome for the employees, or company. Any negative effects could be blamed on the poor economy, and he could wipe his hands of any blame or responsibility.

Do not get me wrong, I completely disagree with the government bailing out private companies. Companies should fail or succeed on there own. The government take over of corporations equates to communism in my mind.

Arested for overdue library book worth $13.95

RELATED ARTICLE

Wow, what a waste of taxpayers money, and huge waste of time.

For failing to return a book to the library that is only worth $13.95, after failing to return repeated telephone calls, and letters by mail, the Iowa police even visited this lady in September before finally filing criminal charges against the woman for theft. The lady was released in a $250 bond. Bonds are typicality returned once the court case is settled. I assume that this case will be dismissed, or she will be provided with a conditional release. The taxpayers of Iowa will have to foot the bill, for the book, the unturned telephone calls, the mail, the police officers salary, and gas for his vehicle to visit her home, the court fees, the salary for the judge, DA and public defender.

So, while attempting to send a strong message to those who do not return library books in Iowa, it appears that they will be costing the taxpayers at least several hundred, to possibly several thousands of dollars.

Sometimes its better to just write things like this off. You should have some kind of minimum threshold to peruse legal charges against someone. Something a little more realistic, like say $50 - $100 minimum loss before taking such drastic action.

WTF is the point of wearing a Mercadies on your finger?

RELATED ARTICLE

$78,000 for an engagement ring! Can you believe that? that's more then most people make in a year. Even more then some people make in 2 or 3 years! And this woman is walking around with it on her finger. Her pussy must be lined with gold or some shit. So what does the dumb bitch do to be featured right here on this page? She dropped that fucker down the shitter!!! That's right, she dropped a $78,000 ring down the toilet. So they have the city break open the sewer in the street looking for it. Then when that failed they called in the professionals, the plumbers with the fiber optic pipe camera.

The city only charged $1000 for there service, meaning that the city taxpayers will likely have to absorb most of the costs in repairing what was damaged while looking for this bitches ring. The plumber bill came up to $5200. For whatever reason these rich people actually had some common sense and tipped the plumbers who found the ring $400 each, and $200 for a worker at the restaurant who stayed late. Most rich people are cheap when it comes to gratuities and tips, so I doubt it was something that they did willingly. Perhaps there gesture of kindness was an attempt to keep the restaurant from looking to send these people a bill when the repairs for the bathroom that was jack-hammered when it comes in. I doubt Mr. Rooter repairs the concrete flooring and tile work. They will likely have to get a GC for that repair work. Expect to see at least another $2-3000 added on to that bill for the repairs to be completed, inside the restaurant, not to mention the road work repairs for repairing the street, and city sewer.

The moral of the story: No pussy is worth $78,000, and also, never give a bitch anything too valuable, because she will just lose that shit or something. If she did not earn the money to purchace it on her own, she will never respect the sacrifice and cost of anything that you provide for her.

Shit, if the ring cost that much, how much is the wedding going to cost? Not many weddings even cost that much.

Coach a HS team... get charged for murder

RELATED ARTICLE

A coach for a HS football team is being charged with reckless homicide because a player collapsed during a practice session, and eventually died 3 days later.

I can not see how this is the coaches fault. The coaches job is to motivate, and push his players and team to be the best that they can be. If this player felt any signs of fatigue, injury, or illness then it was his responsibility to notify the coach, or to take some time to recover. If the player did not show any indication that his health was at risk, or he did not feel that his health was at risk, then how is the coach to know this.

If the DA is successful in prosecuting the coach, or even if he is not, but a civil suit is successful in placing any of the blame on the coach, or school then the repercussions for all school sporting events will be great. What school would be willing to risk the potential liability of being responsible for any injury or death that might occur due to there sporting programs? What person in there right mind would be willing to become a coach if they may be criminally prosecuted for any injury or death that occurs?

I do not wish to place blame on the victim, however the victim in this case is the coach. The player who died pushed himself beyond his own physical abilities. This is not the fault of anyone other then the player who died.

Even if a school does not end there sporting events, and even if they are able to find someone to coach there teams, if this man is found guilty, the sporting events will suffer. Players will not be motivated, and pushed to there greatest potential, and will actually be encouraged to take it easy.

I am not much of a sports fan, but many people take sporting events very seriously, and the outcome of this will just make school sporting events boring, and non-competitive. And if school sporting events become boring and non-competitive our future professional athletes will also suffer from lack of discipline and drive.

suicidal navy seal

RELATED ARTICLE

I just finished writing a blog about a suicide bomber that failed, now There is the ex-navy SEAL, who wants to run 500 miles, from one boarder of Iraq to the other "...without a gun"

He says it will likely take about a month to complete. He thinks that the Iraqis will provide security as they claim is not a problem, but wants to also have US military support. I think the US military has more important things to spend money on, and better uses of the ground troops that are deployed then to provide security for this idiot.

This guy was out there already. I guess he is disappointed that he made it home alive. I just think all of his friends and relatives are encouraging him because he must be one annoying prick, that they can not wait to get rid of. If he goes through with this, it is only a matter of time before he gets a bullet in the head. The US will not provide security, and if they do it will be minimal at best, and after the first few days the novelty will wear off for any security that the Iraqis were to provide, and will taper off until that too is basically non existent.

ching-chong wing-wong ding-dong ping-pong

RELATED ARTICLE

There is no need to re-enforce the stereotype of Chinese drivers, they seem to do a good enough job at that them self.

The driver told police he thought he left the van in park when he got out to make a delivery. But the van rolled backward, jumped a curb on East Broadway and plowed into the preschoolers.
First of all, initial reports claim the driver was making a U-turn. I do not know how a van would end up on the side walk, regardless if it jumped into gear, if it was parallel parked at the curb or double parked. The logical outcome for a situation like that would be for the van to crash into another vehicle. Secondly, how can you not know the difference between park and reverse? And lastly, if you are making a delivery in NYC, why in the fuck would you leave your car on and running, yet alone leave the keys in it? Only a completely irresponsible idiot would do such a thing in NY. It only takes a second for some one to jump in and steal it, or in this case for tragedy to happen.

Chinatown's zip code had 25 fatalities and 1,149 injuries from 1995 to 2005, more fatalities than any other Manhattan zip code.

Both lawmakers asked the city to approve the plan that includes banning trucks and buses from local streets and more safety measures such as speed bumps.


This does not indicate if these fatalities and injuries are a result of motor vehicles or other causes. This is an important factor that is omitted. In the context it would be assumed that they are referring to automobile incidents. If that is the case, then it only perpetuates the stereotype even further.

Banning trucks and buses would no nothing to prevent an incident like this. First off, it was a VAN that jumped the curb, and hit those children not a truck. So the legislators should have stated commercial traffic and buses. However, even if they meant commercial traffic and buses, this still would not resolve the issues, because this van was making a delivery on this block and commercial vehicles are allowed on streets where they are making local deliveries, even if they are normally prohibited from driving along that street. Speed bumps would have little to no effect on traffic in china town, perhaps these people have never been in a car in china town, you are lucky if you get one block after the traffic light changes 3 times, so speed is not a factor. Over crowded streets and poor drivers are the problem. Reducing the roads where commercial vehicles can drive on only creates more traffic on the little streets that they are still permitted to drive on. Things need to get delivered, and service and maintenance workers need to make there repairs and installations. We need to open up more road ways where commercial traffic can drive on in NYC to relieve some of the traffic problems.

Suicide bomber kills 1? what a FAIL

RELATED ARTICLE

KABUL, Afghanistan – A suicide bomber blew himself up at a market in eastern Afghanistan, killing a civilian and wounding eight others, an official said Sunday.
WOW! What a FAIL! I mean, if you are going to be a suicide bomber, don't you think that you would want to take out as many people with you as possible. Especially since you only get one shot at it.

He missed the target but killed one civilian and wounded eight others at Samkanai's market, Samun said.
At least if you are not going to inflict the most damage on the most amount of people, at least make sure that you get your intended target.

What are all the other martyrs going to say when you try to collect your 75 virgins?

We have got kids in school that are more deadly then this one "suicide bomber".

Don't get me wrong, I am not endorsing terrorism, or suicide bombings, but what ever you decide to do in life, you should strive to be the best at it. Don't do things half assed. This story is almost as bad as hearing a story about a suicide bomber that injured or maimed himself, and didn't even accomplish the suicide part of his mission.

Saturday, January 24, 2009

Proposal to say "fuck" freedom of speech

RELATED ARTICLE

Please take a look at the video on the above link. There is a senator who wants to make the use of profanities a felony, punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a fine.

Well fuck! There goes our freedom of speech right out the door. This country is becoming more and more communist each and every day. They want to limit and restrict your rights. They want to take your freedoms away from you. They want to infringe on your civil liberties.

If it is not women in politics, it is these religious nuts. In my opinion the senator on this video clearly looks like some kind of pastor, or other religious fanatic. There is supposed to be separation of church and state, however how could that ever be true? Religion, just like government was meant as a means to control the general public. Religion is used in political campaigns, George W. used religion to his favor, as many of his followers and supporters were religious nuts. The same people that used religion to attempt to persecute Obama's campaign.

The pussification continues..... next they will be implanting chips into our brains, and monitoring our thoughts, and arresting us for thinking the wrong thing. OK this is over the top, and I do not really believe that this will ever happen. I am merely expressing the fact that they are going too far, and there are less and less rights that are left for them to take away, other then our thoughts.

Friday, January 23, 2009

The pussification continues....

So finally a senator who was not voted for has been appointed by a governor who was not voted for.

There is something wrong with that situation, and something needs to be done to ensure that there is a chain of command, or special elections to replace politicians who leave office, or otherwise leave an empty position that is supposed to be an elected position.

So who did this blind appointed governor choose to replace Hilary? Yup, another bitch. Like we need more chicks in legislative positions. The reason that everything is so overly regulated, and that there are so many laws and restrictions is because someone gave bitches authority. Many laws and policies would have never been enacted had it not been for bitches getting involved in the political process. It only perpetuates the pussification of our cunt-tree.

Set your time machines back to around WWII time and stop women from being able to take over the jobs that once belonged to men, and then perhaps we can prevent our present pussified nation.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

fuck the MTA

RELATED ARTICLE

I believe that I bitched, or blogged about this in the past, but it is back in the news again. Albany wants to impose an employment tax to subsidize the MTA. I say fuck that! I do not use buses or the subway system, why should I pay for it? In fact bus drivers piss me off, and I can say that I truly hate them. Here is a thought: Fine bus drivers for impeding the flow of traffic when they do not pull into a bus stop to load or unload passengers when the bus stop is not blocked by someone illegally parked. You can also fine all of the buses that block the intersection when the light changes, and who go through red lights, or disobey traffic laws. These fines can be used to subsidize the MTA's budget. Also fines for parking in a bus stop should be at least partially provided to the MTA. With all of these fines, and the ad revenue that the MTA makes it should have more then enough money, if not raise the fares for the people who use the system, and stop tring to get all the rest of us to pay for something that we have no use for!!

Another thing, the article once again brings up the possibility of charging a toll for all of the bridges entering into manhattan. This is a horrible idea. First, the bridges have been there for a very long time, and are paid for. Second, if a toll is collected for crossing a bridge the money should be used to maintain the bridge, not something else like the buses and trains. Third, this is just another way to try to bring congestion pricing back to the table. Congestion pricing is a terrible idea. This may reduce some of the traffic for those who drive through Manhattan to avoid the tolls of the Triboro bridge, or other bridges linking Brooklyn, Queens and Long Island with the Bronx, and the rest of the state, but those people would just crowd the already crowded highways in Brooklyn and Queens, such as the BQE. A nice consession for all of those people would be to provide free passage at one or more brigde that is linking the Bronx to those of us in Brooklyn, Queens, and Long Island, if you feel the need to start charging people a congestion price, or to toll the East River brigdes. We do not want the added traffic on the BQE that these congestion pricing, or tolls will create.

I also do not believe that those who drive into work in Manhattan that do not need to, and may begin taking public transportation when a plan like this becomes effective have been taken into consideration. This would cause an increase in demand for more service from the MTA, resulting in them needing even more money to upgrade and maintain service. It's a lose-lose situation, regardless of the angle at which you look at it.

Instead of tring to kill 2 birds with 1 stone, as congestion pricing is attempting to do, you need to isolate each trouble, and attempt to resolve each issue individually. The amount of cars, and traffic is enormus. This is the most famous, and important city in the world, so you will never eliminate the problem completely, but there may be steps that can reduce the amount of traffic and gridlock in the city. Adjusting traffic patterns, hiring more traffic agents to monitor, and control more intersections at problem locations, timing traffic lights more effeciently, opening the FDR to commercial traffic and/or adding an elevated roadway or highway to accomidate commercial traffic, either over the FDR or west side. Most of the traffic in Manhattan comes from commercial vehicles and taxis. Taxis are passanger cars, and can travel on any roads in the city, but restricting commercial vehicles to be required to only drive along streets, and not have a highway to aleviate some of the congestion is a major flaw of this city. Only building a highway that includes commercial traffic is worthy of adding an employment tax, anything else needs to find funds elsewhere.

Mili Vanilli made an appearance at the inauguration

RELATED ARTICLE

I can not make stuff like this up.

Carole Florman, a spokeswoman for the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies, says the weather was too cold for the instruments to stay in tune. Cellist Yo-Yo Ma, violinist Izhak Perlman, pianist Gabriella Montero and clarinetist Anthony McGill made the decision on Inauguration Day Tuesday to use an audio tape of their performance that they had laid down two days earlier.
So they pulled an Ashlee Simpson on us. Can someone please explain to me why there is public outcry when pop musicians do this at a performance, where they not only sing (and possibly play an instrument) and also dance, yet when this occurs during one of the most historic dates in recent American history it does not seem like anyone is taking much notice?

you can't spell G_d with out the 'O'

RELATED ARTICLE

Before I get into my opinion on the linked article, a little explanation of the articles title for those unfamiliar with Jewish people. They can not spell out the word god. They can only write it as G_D or G-D.....

OK, now on to the good stuff...

A rabbi participated in an inter-faith ceremony at a church in honor of Obama becoming president. He was chastised by those higher up, because Jewish law says that Jews can not enter into the church or temple of another religion. This is completely ridiculous! While all organized religion is pretty much a sham, the reasons that people turn to religion are prestigious, and righteous. We should all be able to hold each others hand, regardless of religious belief, or lack of religious belief, and pray, or hope for a better future for all mankind.

As a non-jew, I have entered many times into synagoges in the course of my job. While I can understand that they may want to prevent jewish people from worshiping at a competing religion's church or temple, there should not be a restriction on simply entering there place of worship.

Here is a funny quote from the article:
"We really do not want to confuse our theological beliefs with those of other faiths," said the council's executive director, Rabbi Basil Herring.
Trust me, I really do not believe that anyone is going to confuse an orthidox jew with another religion. As for theological beliefs, almost every religion that exists today has similar, if not identical beliefs. And 3 of the major global religions (jewish, christian and muslim) all come from the same book, the old testament!

time to correct the corrections (guards)

RELATED ARTICLE

God damn, not only do you have to watch your back from the pigs trying to stick shit up your ass when you are out on the streets, but now the guards on Rikers have been charged with conspiring with the convicts to beat and extort other prisoners in the system.

We can only hope that then end up on the other side of the bars, being initiated into "The Program" that they started.

everyone is looking for a payday

RELATED ARTICLE

This guy is 21 years old, and just now is coming out claiming that he was molested as a child, starting when he was years old.

Normally I would take a story like this for face value, and assume the possibility of the events occurring as he claims potentially happened. The problem with that in this story is that this happened in a camp ground, and even after the initial abuse this guy continued to return year after year to this camp. I could understand a child not understanding what was happening to them, or to be embarrassed or scared to tell anyone, because they might think it reflected bad on them, or that they somehow felt responsible, however I can not accept that this occurred and he willingly continued to attend this camp.


The "don't ask, don't tell" policy has not yet been rescinded that I am aware of. Therefore he is telling that he had a sexual relationship with another male, and is therefore a fagot. He should be provided a general discharge from the Coast Guard.

Aside from the fact that despite these allegations occurring, year after year he returned to the same camp, he is filing law suits against everyone.

"Cory was playing tennis one day and said he was thirsty and the guy said, 'I have some soda in my bunk, come with me,'" Legnetti's mother, Mary, told The Daily News. "That's how it started. And it happened again the next two summers."

Legnetti, who lives in Wantaugh and is stationed in San Diego, "is speaking out now because this guy still has access to kids and doesn't want this to happen to another boy," his mother said.


If your allegations are true and you seriously did not want this to happen to another boy you should have said something 11 years ago!!

The lawsuit also alleges Evans has "sexually molested numerous children."

Evans is also believed to have worked at Camp Chinipaw as recently as last year.

There has been at least 11 years for these other victims to come forward. If there were numerous victims, then surely at least one of them came forward by now?

Camp Chipinaw, which has been hosting campers ages 7 through 17 since 1926, is named in the lawsuit. So is the Connecticut-based Camp America, which allegedly recruited Evans to work at Camp Chipinaw.
I am curious as to why punitive damages are due from Camp Chipinaw AND Camp America. I do not see the alleged perpetrator mentioned as a defendant, when it was clearly the alleged actions of him that are in question.


"Each Defendant knew or should have known that Evans had sexually molested numerous children, and that Evans was a danger to children long before Evans molested plaintiff," the suit states.

Legnetti claims in the suit that both camps "failed to conduct a proper background check on Evans."

What evidence is there that he had previously molested children. I do not see any evidence, or accusation of a past criminal history in this article, and as noted in the following quote he is a school teacher. Surely if he was previously convicted of a sex crime, especially against children, that he would be bared from being able to be a school teacher. Just this fact alone leads me to accept that even had the camp not done a thorough back ground check, it likely would not have shown any past criminal activity that would bar him from working with children.

Evans, who is from Britain, is a middle school teacher at the Donna Klein Jewish Academy in Boca Raton, Fla. He did not return a phone call or respond to an e-mail sent to his school address.

Again, being a school teacher, there could not have been anything in his background that would have prevented him from working at a summer camp, having access and contact with children. Also, not only does this leave at least 11 years of summer camp, but also however many years as a school teacher for another victim to have come forward. If there truly are "numerous children" then surely at least one other victim would have come forward by now. Also, how would the guy that initiated the lawsuit know that there were "numerous children" with out first hand knowledge, therefore he would have a credible witness. He was able to recall this guy's first and last name from 11 years ago when he was 10, so I am sure that he could remember one of the "numerous children"'s name....

If this truly did happen, then I am sorry for the victim. No one should have to go through what you are alleging, however if these are false allegations, or false memories, then you should feel the wrath of the legal system coming down on you.

Enough with this man made global warming bullshit...

RELATED ARTICLE

Sorry I can not post a link to the Reuters video that was on Yahoo's main page, because the video was embedded, and I was unable to identify the actual URL to where the video resides. The video blames man-made global warming a little more blatantly then the linked article, however the article still claims that man-made global warming exists.

The scientists wrote that the Antarctic warming was "difficult to explain" without linking it to manmade emissions of greenhouse gases, mainly from burning fossil fuels.
Being a scientist, it is your JOB to explain the difficult! I am tired of hearing over and over again about man made global warming. It is a myth.

Humans think that they are more significant then they really are, especially when related to global, and astronomical circumstances. This is proven in history most notably when it was believed that earth was flat. There is nothing on this planet that is unnatural. Everything was always here and will always be here, with the exception of what is deposited here from asteroids, and other space debris, and what is lost, or ejected from our atmosphere. There are no man-made materials, everything comes from nature. Man-altered, perhaps but NO materials on this earth, or anywhere else, are man-made.

Global warming might have been increased, or speed up by man's activities here on this planet, but I do not seem to believe that that is true. There are many factors that affect the temperature of the planet, and "global warming". Sun spots are one of the biggest contributing factors to "global warming". Are we as humans to believe that we are responsible for the conditions on the sun that affect our planet?

Global temperatures have fluctuated the entire life of the planet, with periods of heating and cooling. This is a natural cycle, and will continue regardless if we inhabit this planet or not.

Proof of man-made "global warming" can only be made conclusively if data from other uninhabited planets in our solar system that have an atmosphere is measured and compared to the changes that are occurring on our planet. Yet even that data alone would not be enough to prove the impact man has on the climate of the planet, because no two planets in our solar system are identical, and therefore surface activity, and sub-surface activity would also be a factor in the effects of the global climate.

House arrest with out commiting a crime...

RELATED ARTICLE

A judge in Illinois has ordered a guy who has TB to be required to wear a GPS tracking bracelet. This person did not commit any crimes. He is only guilty of becoming infected with TB. I did not know that being sick was a crime.

Is this not America? Are we not supposedly a FREE society?

If he violates the judges orders, then he will be charged with a class A misdemeanor. I do not know the law codes in Ill, but if they are anything like NY, then class A would be the highest level, meaning that it is basically just below a felony.

Who is supposed to pay this persons bills, since not being charged with any crime, he is restricted to where ever the GPS monitoring bracelet will allow him to go, and therefore unable to work, or make his own income.

There has got to be other ways to prevent the spread of TB then to force this person to not be able to leave his home. While he was in court he wore a face mask, so obviously it is safe for him to be out in public areas if he wears a face mask. So at most he should be required to wear something medically approved to help in the prevention of the spread of TB when out in public.

If things like this are allowed to continue, where does it end? What is to stop "them" from restricting where cancer patients can go? What is to prevent them from forcing you into isolation if you get a cold, or the flu? Who makes the decisions on who needs to remain isolated, or what sicknesses, or diseases are to be treated in the same manner? If this person was truly a threat to the public's health, then I find it difficult to believe that he is being treated at home, and not in a hospital.

Now if this man, or anyone else for that matter, was to intentionally attempt to spread his illness, then he should be criminally prosecuted. However if his intentions are not to cause illness to others, and he is taking the required precautions, as recommended by a doctor then there is no reason to bring criminal charges against him, or subject him to court ordered GPS monitoring.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

BEEN LADEN?

RELATED ARTICLE

OK you probably all already know about the new Bin Laden tape so....

this one is for ECHELON...

Bin Laden secret message terror attack bomb explosion the plan infidel jihad freedom fighters
martyr Muhammad Muslim mosque jew temple new york pentagon planes Guantanamo bay JFK LAX NYC subway system DC metro pentagon white house George bush dick Cheney Obama air force one naval intelligence nuclear weapons grade plutonium dirty bomb shoe bomber some Iraqi dude hiding in a cave Pakistani boarder Afghanistan Al-Queda new world order spy satellites google maps gps coordinates groom lake Nevada area 51 chemical weapons north Korea Iran smuggling small arms Somalia pirates ransom hi mom explosive ordnance ied soft target power plant shopping malls airports train stations Amtrak murder death kill citizens civilians military government anarchy economy depression bigger then 2001 hacker database top secret prison jail escape passport drivers licence boarder patrol homeland security customs check point Canada Mexico Alaska pipe line Yellowstone volcano eruption tony Blair EU NATO empire state building holiday season rush hour times square American idol some bullshit secret code private communication Palestine Gaza strip Israel Nazi Germany concentration camps anarchy Allah Akbar shave your beard prepaid cell phone stolen wifi fake identification funding drug trade criminal activity molesting small farm animals upside down cake and two candles birthday party that's nice (borat) national grid con Edison PG&E power lines hydro electric plants Niagara falls hoover damn Disney land Orlando Florida Madison square garden i has cheezburger all your base are belong to us rick roll some other shit CIA NSA secret service FBI wire tapping AT&T monitoring Internet traffic no fly list terrorist watch list my wife is sick my daughter is sick and you talk about coupon how can I help you sir I bomb that place you mother fucker (jerkey boys)

if you can think of any other "keywords" add them as comments... the more the merrier... fuck em for monitoring the entire Internets....

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

FUCK the NY Daily News, oh... and the PD too...

RELATED ARTICLE

Look, I do not promote the taking of anyone's life. The thing is that the linked article by the NY Daily News is more of an editorial then reporting of facts. Sure the facts are in there, but very highly opinionated.

I admit I crack a smile when one of the NWO's enforcers are taken down, but I do have empathy for his family.

The article attempts to vilify and slander the jury foreman by implying that he basically sees no difference between the police and criminals.

Somehow, a jury whose foreman speaks of cops and criminals in the same breath had acquitted Robert Ellis a month ago of murder and attempted murder while convicting him of three counts of weapons possession.
Then the article goes on to insult the judges interpretation of the law, and sentence.

But the judge also took the view that the law bars consecutive sentences arising from a single act. He was not swayed by the prosecutor's argument that possession of each gun constituted a separate crime.

Ellis was sentenced to three 15-year terms, but it might as well have been one, for they will run concurrent.

This was ONE indecent, and therefore ONE crime, with multiple charges, not separate crimes. They all occurred at the same time. So the judge imposed the maximum punishment allowed by law, 15 years per charge to run concurrent. I do not know how he was charged and convicted of charges for all 3 guns, I am sure of the 3 people in the car, each only had one. Not to mention he is not the shooter. I thought the posters on the subways said that it was 3-5 years for possession of an illegal gun.

I understand the family is in grief, and that nothing will bring there son back, but justice has been served in regards to this person. People do not realize how much time 15 years is sometimes I think.

The only reason why he should have the maxed out sentence is because of the previous charges, however I would be interested in hearing more of the circumstances surrounding that previous charge, as this story is slanted the truth of the previous charge of gang raping a 14 year old girl at gunpoint might be exaggerated to add emphasis to the writers opinion.

Look, this is my blog. It is written based on opinion, thoughts, and perhaps a twist of fiction from time to time, or added dramatic effect. The NY Daily News is a professional source of journalism, it should be a respected unbiased source of information and facts. The only opinions that should exist in the NY Daily News should reside in the editorial section.

GITMO detainees confirmed tourtured!!

RELATED ARTICLE

Finally it has been proven... while many will say that the people at Guantanamo Bay are all terrorists, lets not forget that there have been some people lucky enough to be released from there because they were innocent. Let's not forget innocent until proven guilty. Our torturous treatment of these detainees, as well as that fiasco with Abu Ghraib.

Should these people be held? Most likely there are reasons of national security that most of them SHOULD be held somewhere, BUT... if they are guilty of something present the evidence, bring them to some sort of trial.... The only reason to hold someone for an indefinite amount of time with out charge is because of lack of evidence.

Torture should never be acceptable... well for those of you who say "yea, but these are really bad people and they deserve everything that they get"... I could accept it slightly better if there is evidence, or some sort of proof that they in fact have the proper people, and even then I would have a difficult time accepting torture as punishment.

Patriot Act = loss of constitutional rights and protections = potential to be labeled an "enemy combatant" = ability for them to send you to GITMO and get tortured....

Trust me... they label EVERYTHING "terrorism" now-a-days... organized crime, street gangs, drug crimes, etc.....


Restraining order bullshit...

RELATED ARTICLE

OK, so this chick had a restraining order against her "baby daddy", (let's get it right the article says "ex-boyfriend, but seriously they had an 11 year old girl) and he ends up killing her. That's some fucked up shit, BUT... these people want to make it more difficult for a man to be a good father to his child.

They are petitioning to toughen the laws for those who violate orders of protection. That in itself may not be such a bad thing, although I would need some point of reference as to what the punishment currently is, they are looking for the punishment to be 3-5 years in prision. I believe this to be harsh for most cases. Either a probation sentence of no more than 3-5 years, or 6 months to a year jail time should be plenty, for first time violators, but also dependent upon the level of violence history, and circumstances surrounding the order of protection.

The fucked up part, that made me want to blog about this news story is that they want to restrict child visitation in cases involving domestic abuse. Now I do not think that it is right to beat on a bitch or anything like that, but tempers flare, and each situation is diffrent. Each situation needs the circumstances to be evaluated to make an educated decision. But unless the domestic violence was directed towards the children in any way (in which case it would become endangering the welfare of a minor, or child abuse etc.) then there should not be any restrictions on a man who is only trying to be a father to his child(ren).

The other fucked up thing is these fucking feminnazi's "women's rights groups". First of all if you want equal rights, let me tell you, there are bitches who are abusive to there husbands just as well. So there is your equal rights, so where is the "rights groups" for those men? Secondly, let me tell you this.... you want some rights? I'll give you some rights. The right to "get in the kitchen and make me some pie"!! (Quoted from the great Eric Cartman)

You know, I am sorry that this guy was an asshole, and shot his "baby momma" in front of his child, but the fact remains, this guy was fucking nuts, and murder has got to have the highest penalty in the judicial system, so another 3-5 years was not going to deter this person from taking this woman's life. They claim she would still be alive if he had faced penalties earlier. If that was the case two things should have happened for him to face those penalties. First he would have had to violated the order of protection, secondly, she or someone who witnessed him violating the order of protection needed to file a police report.

The article claims that he did not care about the order of protection and continued to come around. First off, perhaps this woman encouraged him to continue to come around, we do not know the circumstances, sometimes people think they can work things out after they already filed an order of protection. Secondly, what was the circumstances for him to come around. Was he harassing or threatening this woman, or was he trying to be a part of his child's life? And finally, did anyone ever report these violations to the police department? If these violations were reported to the police department, then they failed to do there job and keep him away from her. But if no one ever reported it, then there is no record of him ever violating the order of protection, and therefore just the family's word that he had. Clearly if he had violated the order of protection and it was brought to the attention of the police they would have taken some sort of action.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

what a DICK

RELATED ARTICLE

It's bad enough we have got this Maddox (sp?) asshole running around fucking things up, it seems like that is SOP (standard operating procedure) in the world of finance.

This dick hole screws people out of hundreds of thousands of dollars, perhaps even more. So when he gets caught, he places many peoples life into danger by attempting to fake his own death by crashing a plane, that he had parachuted out of.

Luckily this fuck head did not injure or kill anyone by his stupidity. I hope that he is found alive, so that he can pay for what he did. Him killing himself for real, would be too easy of a punishment for this guy. Hopefully he is captured, and full restitution is made to those who were cheated by this person. The only sad thing, is fucks like this get minimal time in jail, if they even get any jail time. Stealing large amounts of money, and ruining peoples retirement and investment funds is never punished the same as petty street crimes.... It's just the rich getting richer. I should become a financial adviser, and perhaps people will give me there life savings so that I could live luxuriously...

Peta is nucking futz

RELATED ARTICLE

PETA wants to rename a school from Spearfish to Sea Kitten. They want to do this because they want to make people think that fish are friendly and have personalities and such. They also say in the article
"We want people to realize that more fish are killed each year than all animals combined," he said. "They don't have the sympathy of more popular animals like cats and dogs."
Umm, YEA! How much meat is there per fish? How much meat is there in other animals? It could easily take hundreds of fish to provide the same amount of weight in food as one cow. So of course more fish are killed per year then all other animals combined, I would be shocked if that was not the case. I however do not eat seafood, but many people enjoy fish and seafood, including many of the vegetarians that are tree hugging hippie fucks like the rest of PETA, but I guess they want us to all be vegan and/or aneorexic.

I belive Kurt Cobain said it best when he sang "it's OK to eat fish, 'cause they don't have any feelings" perhaps these fucks need to listen to alittle more Nirvana.

sorry for the absence

Well, I have been busy lately, and the down time that I did have there was nothing in the news articles that I had read that annoyed me enough to blog about... But I am feeling pretty annoyed today, so even the smallest stupidest news article is going to get me going...

I'll try to post more frequently when possible... leave comments... let me know your here... you don't need to sign up, or log in to post comments, just verify one of those annoying things that proves you are a person...

Monday, December 15, 2008

Is Patterson blind, or mentally challanged?

RELATED ARTICLE

This blind fuck, who was never elected into office wants to add a 15% "obesity" tax on any soda that is not "diet" Is this mother fucker serious?

First of all, diet soda has that fake sugar shit that causes cancer, secondly it taste like ass.

I am not obese, so I should not have to pay a tax for fat ass mother fuckers. Perhaps if you are a fat ass and buy something that does not say diet on it, then you should be charged a fat ass tax... this is just plain retarded.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

How to deal with the phedz...

Some people just do not understand how to deal with the phedz, or law enforcement....

While law enforcement is one of the lowest forms of life on the earth, someone who feels that they have the authority to pass judgment on another person and there actions, some people just do not understand how they operate, and how to deal with them.

While there are certain things that I will hold back on, as If I ever have the need to use some of the methods they will not be as easily identifiable with my actions.

First off, always make every attempt to be respectable in your communications with the phedz. Try not to act like an asshole, or give them any reason to add resisting arrest, assault of a law enforcement officer, impeding a law enforcement investigation, or any other retarded charges like that to whatever else it might be that they are attempting to pin on you.

First, I do not endorse, or encourage anyone to take any illegal actions. If you must, please only do the minimum of illegal activities that is required to obtain your goal. Try to keep any illegal activities away from your home, or any communications medium that can be traced back to you, such as cell phone, home phone, computer, PDA, etc... Never discuss any of your illegal activities with anyone who does not need to know about them, even those who do need to know, share as little info as possible. Sometimes you may want to brag about your sucesses, this is a bad idea.

When confronted as either a suspect, person of intrest, or for any other reason, remember that law enforcement will pretend to act like your friend. They are not your friend! They are doing there job, and there job is to "get you off the streets". Tell them your name and where you live if they ask. You may feel the need to communicate some "small talk" with them about seemingly unrelated topics. Regardless if you are sitting in that interview chair, they are always "on" listening to every word that you say, even in idle conversation, in fact, the idle conversation is where you feel your guard is down, and they may attempt to lead the conversation to get you to slip up. Never discuss anything with them. Speak to law enforcement only thru a lawyer. Deny everything, and remain silent. You have that right you know. If you are required to communicate with them a lawyer will inform you what you are required to communicate with them.

Even if you are not the "prime suspect" of there investigation, don't say shit! Tell everyone around you, friends, faimly members, co-workers to not say shit to the phedz... they will attempt to work there small talk mostly with those around you who you may have "confessed" your illegal actions, or who may have been witness to these alleged crimes.

Keep no evidence in your home. Keep your computer free of any evidence, or illegal activities. Keep your PDA, and other portable electronic devices "clean"

Cell phones can be tracked even when you are not on the phone, many have GPS, but even the ones that do not they can triangulate the signal. Never bring your cell phone with you in the commision of a crime. It is also alleged that the phedz can turn on the mic of a cell phone to listen in even when the phone is not in use, and even if the phone is off. Remove the battery of your cell phone if you have to bring it with you, and remove it any time you need to have a sensitive conversation.

OnStar is a tracking device. If you have OnStar, remove it from your car, there are websites that tell you how to accomplish this. There are other similar systems such as LoJack, not only can they be used to track the car if it has been stolen, but they can track your movements.

While thinking about never using EZpass, it does not matter if you have EZpass or not, all toll crossings have video cameras, and likely have licence plate readers, so try to avoid any toll booths.

If using pubilc transportation, do not purchace rides with a credit card. Do not purchace metrocards with a credit card!!! Only purchace single ride fares, and pay cash. Once beyond the turnstyle dispose of the paper metro card as soon as possible. Having the metro card or single ride card on you will allow them to track when and where you entered the transit system, and they can track your movements.

Make efforts to avoid video survallance, especially police owned cameras on the streets. Private cameras should also be avioded as much as possible, but require a seobpena to be released to the police, so they may either fail to obtain the video, or obtaining the video may be delayed. Police owned cameras will be available to the phedz in real time....

Always use a "clean" PC from a "clean" location when communicating on the internet. Use public hotspots, and use a proxy server, also never use a PC that you have used the WiFi card, or PC on your home network. Replace this PC if you have to, if the evidence with connecting this PC to you is so strong. Never name your PCs with something that can be tied to you. Never add any personally identifiable information to this PC. Never access your normal email address with this PC, and Never use the same internet browsing habits with this PC that you do at home. Never use hotspots near your home, school, or work place.

Always communicate from a pre-paid cell paid for in cash, that is not connected to you in any way. Keep the SIM card out of the phone when charging the battery, and keep the battery out of the phone when not making a call. Do not keep this phone for long periods of time. Do not replace this phone from the same location where you purchaced it when it has outused its useful life. You may also use payphones to communicate, but try not to use the same pay phone frequently, or they may begin to monitor that phone. Do not use a payphone, or prepaid phone anywhere near your home, school or workplace.

The most important thing, that I must repeat tho, is never admit guilt to anything, do not talk, do not make any attempt to communicate with the phedz at all. They are not your friend. A lawyer can advise you of what you are required to tell them, but always stick to the bare minimum. You do not want to incriminate yourself any further then any evidence that they might already have.

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Fingerprints... violation of privacy

RELATED ARTICLE

I never associated fingerprints, or the police using fingerprints to be a violation of ones personal rights. However reading the article in the link above, it just sickens me what science is doing... We are not going further, they are looking for more and more ways to monitor and track us.

I hate working with gloves on, even when for safety reasons I should wear gloves for certain functions, I just can not work comfortable with them on my hands. I do not feel like I have a good enough grip.

Reading what they are doing with this technology makes me want to shave off all of my body hair, and wear rubber gloves and a hazmat suit everywhere I go, as to not leave any biological evidence that I ever was anywhere. Yes I know that is taking it extreme, and I was kidding (to a degree) but seriously, the potential for this technology to not only be used by law enforcement, but also could be commercially available, meaning it could be used by anyone.

Who provides the permission to perform medical tests on my biological debris? While someone might say, the sample was left behind, and therefore discarded, and may be used by who ever finds it, I must disagree. If I leave my key to my home somewhere, does that give someone who finds those keys the right to enter into my home uninvited?

Any biological, or medical testing done should be done with the consent and knowledge of the person who is the subject of the testing.

I think that fingerprinting, as being done currently for law enforcement purposes should be allowed. Using finger prints to identify a person being at a location, or handling an object. But performing medical testing on such sample should not be allowed, with out the consent of whoever "owns" those fingerprints.

The potential for abuse of this technology far outweighs the benefits that it might have. The only potential benefit that this technology might have is in the medical field, to reduce invasive testing procedures. And to be performed with the consent of the testing subject.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

FUCK THE POLICE

RELATED ARTICLE

Good job at keeping the cops who abuse there authority, and use excessive force off of the streets NYPD. It has come to my attention, that the pig who shoved his baton up the ass of some guy on the subway system had been accused of police brutality just one year ago. What puzzles me about this previous accusation, which I will need to look into further, is that they found no evidence of wrong doing, however they still settled a lawsuit with the victim. Now answer this to me, if you did not do anything wrong, then where is your finincial responsibility to ccompensate a victim? If there was no wrong doing, then there was no victim, and therefore should be no settlement. The previous settlement over the acctions of this officer indicate an admission of wrong doing, and therefore he should have been removed from a position where he had the potential to abuse the authority provided to him.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Voting means NOTHING!!

RELATED ARTICLE

So I am starting to think more and more every day that voting makes absolutely no difference at all at least not in NY.

First we have a governor who was appointed, because Spitzer fucked up. In this article linked above it also mentions that the states chief fiscal officer DiNapoli also was given his position by default, replacing Hevesi.

Now we are going to get a senator appointed by the governor, who was never even elected into his position. Why? because one of our senators, who never lived a day in her life in NY until she ran for office is leaving to take a position appointed by the president elect.

With all of these people being appointed, and even more disturbing, being appointed by others who were them self appointed where is the democracy in that?

Granted In the past, I have only voted for president, and not on the local level, but that was because at the time, I was not too aware of the players in local and state politics.

I thought when I was in school they taught us a chain-of-command in politics, where as there was always someone in line to to move up one position should it be needed. I was unaware that that was only for the position of president.

There should be a chain-of command structure, if it is not already, but judging by the fact that the governor must choose the next senator it does not appear to be so. The reason for this is that even though a person may get a position by default, at least the people voted for him, and were aware of the circumstances. Everyone understands if something happens to the president, the VP takes over as president, why can it not be so simple for other positions, such as on the state wide level?

Here we are pushing our flavor of government, and democracy around the world to Muslim countries, who believe that there leaders are appointed by Allah (so you tell me how democracy will work), and in the mean time, we are living in a dictatorship.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Jumping the gun a bit?

RELATED ARTICLE

Schools are being renamed after Barack Obama, and they even want to rename mountains, etc. after Obama.

Is it not a little too early for this? Yes it is historical that Obama has been the first black president elected in the US, but as to if he will be a good leader remains to be seen, he has not yet taken office.

How would it have been if we were to name things after George W. Bush before he took office, only afterwards to find out the kind of leader that he has become?

Renaming ceremonies should occur only after the president leaves office, but IMO should not occur until after the person's passing. I do not believe that something should be renamed after someone while they are still alive. The renaming of a building, school, or anything else should be used to immortalize the persons name and there place in history AFTER there life, and accomplishments.

Friday, November 21, 2008

Auto industry bail out?

I knew that another industry was going to go to the government looking for free money. It was the Auto industry, my bad I thought It would be the telecommunications companies, but there day will come....

So Here is a thought... Why doesn't the government (city, state, and federal) stop buying all of these piece of shit foreign hybrid Toyota Prius'es and get back to buying only American cars?

It pisses me off when I see official licence plates on a foreign car like a Prius. What ever happened to the days where if you saw a government owned vehicle it was made in America by Ford or Chevy.

Perhaps if they stoped buying from these foreign companies the auto industry would not be in such bad shape. Sure it would still be struggling, but fleet purchases can produce a lot of revenue.

I am also not afraid to say this, but NAFTA and free trade is what started the downfall of the economy. When you outsource our jobs, sure some fuck in a backwards country gets a job. Sure the company can save money on salary, because third world employees make less a week then an American makes in an hour. Sure the company can increase there revenue, and stock prices by lowering overhead costs. Sure the cost of the product will drop, making the product accessible to more consumers. Wait, heres where it starts to get better, Sure the quality of your product will go to shit, because of inferior labor and materials. Sure Americans who's job was outsourced will remain on unemployment, because no new jobs are being created here, but more jobs are being lost every day. Now regardless of how cheap your product is made your consumer base will drop substantially, requiring you to make your product even cheaper. Resulting in escalating returns for defective products. Resulting in failing stock prices.... and a whole country out of work, with some resorting to criminal activities just to survive...

So, should the automakers be bailed out? Only if a stipulation of the bail out is that it be used to secure American jobs, and only if all the companies vehicles that are sold in the US are made in the US. I stop at the point requiring them to produce all of there vehicles in the US for cost saving reasons. They should be permitted to make cars in Mexico, Canada, or some third world country for cars that will be exported, so long as those exported cars are not sold in the US.

For fuck sakes, there are foreign car makers building cars here, but American cars are made somewhere else.

Stop crying about $2.50 faggots

RELATED ARTICLE

God Damn, people are crying about paying $2.50 to ride the bus or train if the MTA raises the rates like they would like to do.

I don't know about you, but in this day and age $2.50 sounds like a great fucking price to get to where you are going. All you faggot ass mother fuckers need to stop being such assholes, and just pay to ride the fucking bus or train.

If you want to cry so much, why not stop taking the bus and train and drive a car? If more people drove cars then there would be less buses on the road to piss me off. FUCK I hate bus drivers!!

My problem goes back to having advertisements on city owned property, most of which is MTA property. If I had that much ad revenue, the buses and trains would be free, but that's not the point. The ads should not be there in the first place. To me it becomes a conflict of interest, and seriously how can a government (local, state, or federal) endorse any product or service?

Just can't dump the bitch

RELATED ARTICLE

Damn, just when you thought you were done with Hillary (well except for being a senator for a state she never lived in) she is on her way back to DC to fill a position in the white house.

I thought that the American people voted to keep a bitch out of the white house. But I guess that our votes don't count, cause she is being appointed secretary of the state. Unfortunately the secretary of the state is not really a secretary that answers phones, and you stay late at the office with.

If we wanted a woman in the white house we would have voted for Hil in the democratic primaries, or for Palin (cause how many years does McCain really have left any way)

if you dont like the president you are racist!

RELATED ARTICLE


Sorry I should have posted on here more frequently over the past few weeks, however things in the news just seem too overwhelming. I could spend a lifetime posting about EVERYTHING that is wrong with the world...

Anyhow... the related article is just one of the many stories that have been going around since election day, and most likely even before that...

The article said that some kids graffitied the words "kill obama" on some cars. Where is the racism in that? No where in the article was there any mention of any terms used to single out any particular race of people, so it has come down to the fact that if you do not like the president-elect then you are a racist!

If that is the case, can we call people who hate president Bush, who are of a diffrent nationality or race then he is, racist? I do not think so. Ever since there have been presidents, there have been people who supported, and people who opposed them.

Is there the possibilities that those comments were motivated by racism? Yes, that possibility does exist. But does the possibility that those comments were motivated by something other then race? The answer to that is also yes, and until further details of the circumstances are revealed, I think that it is irresponsible journalism, and law enforcement to immediately judge that these crimes (vandalism) were motivated by racism until all of the facts have been presented.

Obama is not the first president to have death threats, nor will he be the last, unless our government collapses and there are no presidents after him...

I did not vote in this past election, because there was an issue with my voter registration being placed into inactive status, I assume since I moved several years ago and never updated my voter registration. And I did not feel like fighting with a 100 year old pole worker for a provisional ballot. Most likely at the time I would have voted for Obama, however now looking at some of the policies that he wants to put in place, if I were to have voted, Ralph Nader would have taken my vote once again (although I did not follow his recent campaign, so I do not know his current standpoint on the issues)

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

FUCK MIKE!

RELATED ARTICLE

If you didn't know... now you know, I am from NYC, so what ever this dick head fuck of a mayor does affects me.

This douche bag cunt wants to increase income tax in the city? Is he fucking kidding me? I already pay federal, state, and city tax, and am losing about 1/3 of what I bust my ass to make. My rent is about 1/2 what I take home, so I only have 1/2 of my salary to pay all of my ever increasing bills, now you want to take more out of my pocket?

Fire fighters should have all of the training and resources that they need at there finger tips. One of his methods of reducing what the city pays out is by reducing fire fighters training? Is he out of his fucking mind?

There are plenty of city agencies that are completely fucking useless.

Lets not forget, we recycle in NYC now... where is all of the money from all of the metals that we recycle? Surely you are selling all of the metal that we have to separate from our garbage to a recycling plant and making some money off of that?

What about all of the advertisement on public, city owned property, such as all the buses, subways, DMV (ok, this one is state) and other offices and buildings, where is this money?

you already doubled parking tickets, and you want to increase fines, and penalties to increase revenue?

Where the fuck is all of this money?

What I think that the problem is, is that the city government, (as well as state and federal) have money invested in private companies and banks, which should NEVER happen. The government, on any level (city, state, fed) should never have an interest in the finances of private companies. Government money should be separate from the private sector, specifically for this reason. Yes, they stand to "lose" the potential to increase there revenue by not being invested in private companies, however government money should be secure.

The economy should have no bearing on the employment of government workers, or the services available from the government.

This douche is going to push workers, and by default employers out of NYC then where is the city going to get money from?

Good job blue..

Obama won, just as I predicted when McBain (opps wait thats the dude from The Simpsons) picked a chick to be his running mate.

Not much time to write, right now because I am off to work, just wanted to leave a quick post.

Am I the only color blinded person ever? I am glad that the dems won the white house, and that Obama will be the next president, but It seemed more that people were talking race then anything. It bothered me much to see all the talk about him being black. (excuse me I find the politically correct term of "African-American" racist and offensive, and I am a WB)

The issues and the best MAN to do the job is who should have been elected..

then again with an old ass dude, and the first black candidate in this racist country, you were really voting for Palin vs. Biden, cause McCain will go of natural causes soon, and the KKK well, there plans have already been spoiled...

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Talk about over bearing parents...

RELATED ARTICLE

So this kid is 12 years old, and in college. What is the point? There should be regulations against such things. This is depriving the child time of his youth, to develop all the life/social skills that we do during junior high school (intermediate or middle school for some of you mother fuckers), and high school
years. It is not just the books, and tests where we learn. It is also with the social interactions.

This child is going to go thru puberty surrounded by adults, and several things can happen, none really that good. First he will not have any one to relate to as far as what changes his body is going thru. And secondly, he is likely to end up in an inappropriate sexual relationship with another student.

Further dissection of the related article link above mentions several other issues. He has been active with collage since he was 8. EIGHT FUCKING YEARS OLD!!!!! what 8 year old do you know, or have ever met that says, "yea... I think I want to go to collage right now"? This is a parent pushing a child way too far. Guess PhD mom is one of those people when you get too smart, you start to go off the other end, and become stupid again, to force a child to attend collage. Even if this was the child's choice she was not intelligent enough to realize that a child's mind is not yet fully developed, and does not always make the right decisions for what is best, that is the job of the parent. It becomes even more disturbing when it is revealed that the father committed suicide when this kid was 2 according to the article because he was so smart, and didn't fit in, or cared what people thought of him. Its a stupid reason to kill yourself, and I doubt it is completely accurate, but if that is the case, pushing you child in this way is only going to make him more likely to follow his fathers footsteps. But I forgot, the article says the child has "thick skin". Well, suicidal thoughts normally take some time to develop, and if the lady's husband was able to pull it off with out the wife being suspicious then what chance does she have at seeing her child's signs of suicidal thoughts?

Life may be short, but its not too short to steal a childhood away from someone. What memories of childhood with this boy have to look back on when he becomes an adult.

Also, who is teaching this child if he still believes in the myth of global warming being a man-made phenomena? Global warming is natural, and caused by solar storms, and sun spots. Polar shifts, and climate change are natural parts of our planets history, and to believe that us as humans are having a major impact on the climate of the globe is similar thinking of the world being flat, or us being the center of the universe, where everything revolves around us. We are insignificant when it comes to global, and astronomical circumstances. EVERYTHING on this planet is natural. Even man-made materials are made from nature. There is no more, or no less of ANYTHING on this planet (aside from any debris from space) then when this planet was created, and when we are all extinct, the planet will heal itself of any signs of our existence.

Google uses youtube NOT google video...

RELATED LINK


Just a little short one for all you out there... click the link above. It is an instructional video, I assume, about Google reader. I did not watch the video, but I found it quite amusing that they are using youtube and not there own Google video to host the file.

If you're not part of the soloution...

RELATED ARTICLE
The fucking things that you read on the internet... especially things that are linked in on the front page of yahoo.. who the fuck thinks these things up? This article that I read is so fucking unbelievable, and its in some kind of list format, that I am going to have to do things a little diffrent then normal and cut and paste parts of the article here, with my comments for each section... I guess my comments will be in red... I'll Just post the whole list, with there comments, then mine in red below... to save time, you can just read my comments if you want....


  1. Spending time apart strengthens your bond. Sure, it's important to hang out with your guy. But experts now know that it's almost as important not to hang out with him every so often. "When you take time away from each other, it gives you both the opportunity to collect new thoughts, new stories, and new ideas to share," says Jennifer Oikle, PhD, dating coach for Coupling Connection. But the benefits extend beyond having novel tidbits of conversation. "When you're with someone in the moment, you're not really spending time thinking about them," says Debbie Magids, PhD, coauthor of "All the Good Ones Aren't Taken." "When you're distanced, you really think about the person and yearn for them, and you look forward to seeing them again."
    This is probably the ONLY good advice in this article. We do not want to be bothered by you 24/7 give us some space, and then we will enjoy the time we have together more.
  2. Your inkling that something is wrong in the relationship is probably right. By nature of being a woman, you have a keen intuition, so you'll feel any kind of distancing on a visceral level pretty quickly. I did not realise that men did not have a sense of intuition. I guess we are just dumb oafs. I guess it is not sexist, unless it relates to women. Good job. And unless you're an overly suspicious or insecure person -- you know who you are! -- you should always trust your gut. Example: He's incommunicado. Um, English please, your attempt at trying to sound intellegent with big words failed. Why not just say "He's not communicating" or "He wont fucking talk to you" Before the days of emailing, texting, IMing, and Facebooking, if you didn't hear from your boyfriend for a day or two, it wasn't the end of the world (or your relationship). And it should not be the end of the world now either, everyone does not want to be smothered by someone, people need there personal space, you had it right with #1, then this contradiction. But now that communication is so easy and instant, it's usually a sign he's not fully invested.
    "When a guy wants to break up, he'll often start to create space," says Oikle. In other words, he'll stop calling quite as much, it will take him a bit longer to return your texts or emails, and he'll sometimes be "too busy" to hang out. Well, maybe you should fucking listen, if he is too busy he is too busy, or you are just annoying him too much. People have jobs, and other activities in life that they can not stop every two seconds to talk to you. Unless there is an emergency, you are not hearing from me until I get home, don't fucking bother me when I am busy. "For the record, if a guy is into you, he'll never be too busy," says Paul Coleman, PsyD, author of "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Intimacy." Complete Idiot seems to be right, life does not revolve around you. You are not the most important person in the world, and yes, sometimes there are things that are more important then you and require attention. Sometimes people are just fucking busy.
    If the pattern continues, confront your man about his behavior in a direct yet nonaccusatory way, saying something like "You haven't called me, and I'm thinking that means you're having second thoughts about us." If he doesn't give you a clear answer, well, let's just say he's giving you a clear answer. Talking shit like that is bound to get you more distance with just about every man. Look you are either hanging out enjoying your time together or not, why do you have to question everything. If you have to ask stupid questions like this you are probably a clingy bitch who no one is going to want to spend any time with.
  3. If a man has a history of cheating on his girlfriends, he'll probably cheat on you too. Oh, so women are above cheating? How about if the bitch stole you from another chick, she is probably going to go look for some other man to steal from some other chick. Sometimes a guy cheats on his partner because there is an emotional or physical void in the relationship. But more often than not, philandering is indicative of something wrong with him. Not really, unless having a dick is something wrong with him. Dudes just want to fuck something diffrent from time to time, some are just better at resisting the temptations then others. This in no way indicates anything positive, or negative about you. According to Jay Carter, PsyD, author of "Nasty Men,"
    “many guys two-time because they love the thrill of the chase”
    many guys two-time because they love the thrill of the chase, they need to feed their ego, or they have a hard time turning down a woman when the opportunity presents itself.
    All those factors contribute to serial straying, "which is why men who cheat once usually cheat again," says Oikle. (A recent MSNBC.com survey found that men are twice as likely as women are to cheat more than once.) Don't believe this one, perhaps women are twice as likely to be deceptive and outright lie in surveys. So if your guy cheated on his last girlfriend with you, don't necessarily write it off as an isolated incident. And if you are a dirty little whore...
  4. He wants to think he's taking care of you. Despite the fact that many women are outpacing men on the college level and in the workplace, "lots of guys still derive their feelings of masculinity and self-worth by being of value to the person they love," True to a degree, but get a fucking job, just because we feel the need to "take care of you" does not mean we want to be taken advantage of, we work fucking hard, put some of your own finances into the fucking relationship. says Allen Berger, PhD, author of "Love Secrets Revealed." "And they feel most valuable when they're doing things for that person." So even though you're an independent chick who can support herself, it may benefit your relationship if you step back once in a while and let him step up -- FUCK THAT, one of my biggest turn-ons is a chick who got her own money. even if it's just to do something as simple as pay for dinner. Think of it this way: Letting him care for you shows you care for him. And paying for your own shit shows you RESPECT him, his hard work, and the value of a dollar.
  5. If a guy tells you that he's not ready for a relationship, take his word for it. Believe it or not, men really hate to disappoint women. As much as bitches disappoint us. So if he's "gotten up the guts to actually cross the threshold and tell you that he's not ready for a relationship, he means business," says Oikle. There could be a variety of explanations for his antirelationship position (he has commitment issues, he wants to meet other people, he doesn't see you as girlfriend material), You forgot - he could be married, or just wants a fuck toy.. then there is the chance he likes it in the ass... but in the end, the result is the same: He's doesn't desire to be your boyfriend. End of story.
    And no, he won't change his mind when he gets to know you a little better. "Once a guy decides how he sees a girl in his life, it's hard to break out of that thinking,"Wow, they got one right... I know, or need to make up my mind shortly after meeting someone if I will be, or wish to be romantically involved with someone. says Coleman. Warning: If you stick around after he's told you this, he will likely take it as a sign that you're cool with the casual, nonexclusive nature of your relationship. So make sure you are. And if you are not cool with it, and still stick around, either you are deaf, or you are the kid that had to put your hand on the stove as a kid, instead of take mommy's advice that it was hot and not to touch it.
  6. Passion can grow as a relationship progresses. People used to think settling down meant saying goodbye to romance and passion. But research has found that young married couples are more satisfied in the romance department than their single counterparts are. Since when? Isn't it more fun to fuck a stranger, or a diffrent person from time to time, then the same ole same ole? Familiarity definitely has its perks. Couples who have been together for a long time have probably learned how to please each other and are more comfortable sharing their fantasies and desires to keep the romance alive. The biggest clue that the person who wrote this is a virgin, the word probably!! If you been together for a long time, there is no fun fucking the same person for the 1,000th time, there is no new uncharted territory.
  7. You won't regret breaking up with a guy you're feeling unsure about. Nowadays, women may be impulsive about dating guys sluts but not dumping them. "In fact, a lot of single women will try really hard to fit a square peg into a round hole because they want the relationship to work so bad," explains Magids. "It's only after a tremendous amount of thought and effort that they finally give up on it."
    In part, women go through that painstaking process because they fear they'll end up kicking themselves for ending a relationship too soon. But a new study from Northwestern University found that even in the short term, people aren't as upset as they thought they'd be after a breakup. The longer you waste someone's time, the more upset they are going to be. So if you sense you're with the wrong person, don't fret so much about walking away to find a better mate.
  8. You will always be the one to initiate a relationship talk. Unlike women, who are conditioned to take the pulse of a relationship from time to time, men don't contemplate the state of your union until something's wrong. And even then, they want to work it out in their mind, whereas women want to talk it out. Look, you are ALL basically the same. You all annoy the shit out of us with these stupid conversations about our relationship. We just end up settling with the one we find least annoying, or that we can block out all of the fucking nagging.
    When you go to initiate a relationship talk, bear in mind that men are uncomfortable with the unknown and paranoid that you'll end up in tears. So don't ambush him or it'll feel to him like going to the principal's office or being pulled over by a cop: surprising and nerve-racking, says Coleman.
    To put him at ease, try what Oikle calls a compliment sandwich: Start with something positive, work in the concern, and end with something positive. For example, if you're trying to gauge if a new guy sees your relationship as serious, say, "I really like you a lot. Are you thinking this is a long-term thing? We've been having so much fun that I hope you do!" That will be much easier for him to digest than "Hey, am I your girlfriend or what?" Honestly, the "We've been having so much fun..." quote sounds like it is from a whiny bitch, I would much rather chill with the chick that said "yo, am I your girl or what?" Or if you want to broach the subject of moving in with a dude you've been dating for a while, try "I think we have an amazing relationship, and I'm ready to take the next step and move in together. Think of how much fun we'd have living under the same roof!" Or just be honest, "Hey I am a succubus, and I don't want to pay my own rent, or bills anymore, and I know your not stupid enough to pay for my own apartment (or I know my pussy isn't good enough for you to pay for my own apartment) so I thought I would leech off of you at your place for a while" or you could explain that you do not trust him and think he is fucking other chicks at his house, and you want to move there to make sure he can't fuck anyone ever again... it goes on...
Well, that is all for now... I could not figure out how to vent my frustrations on the stupidity of the author, and "specialists" in this article, with out this type of format where I add comments to the article. Seems like everyone in this country has gone fucking stupid. Well I won't promise any scheduled updates, but... until next time I read something that is truly retarded and pisses me off where I need to vent... l8rz

WTF? There is such thing as "pregnancy discrimination?"

RELATED ARTICLE


I just don't understand this world. Pregnancy discrimination for fuck sake? If I own a business where I have to hire employees, I would want employees who are able to do the job physically, and consistently. I would want someone that is going to be reliable, dependable, and able to work more then just a few weeks, or months. A pregnant chick fulfills none of these requirements.

I am not saying that if a chick becomes pregnant while employed that she should be fired, unless of course she becomes unreliable, or unable to perform her work duties, just as any non-pregnant employee would be. Now I am sure a bunch of bitches will flip out about that comment, but seriously, it would be discrimination NOT to fire an employee who was unable to perform there work duties. If you can not perform your duties at work, you should take your leave of absence, or maternity leave or whatever the fuck you do.

As for hiring someone who is pregnant... Who the fuck goes out looking for a job AFTER they are pregnant? She should have had a job, or not been fucking with out protection. The only reason that I can see someone do this is to try to stick it to there employer for health benefits. Seriously, how long can they work before they are on leave, a few weeks? A few months? and this is the career that they have been dreaming about that they are going to just rush back to work after giving birth?

Lets get fucking real people... enough of this political correct bullshit! Lets just all use a little fucking common sense .

Friday, September 19, 2008

Fuck the surgon general

RELATED ARTICLE

Hey pregnant ladies.... smoke 'em if you got 'em...

a study found that the surgeon general is a fucking idiot... smoking does not cause any problems with your pregnancy, except your kid may be born underweight and then become a fat ass... but other then that... its all good...

Who knows where this report comes from perhaps they need more tax revenue, and too many pregnant chicks are quiting and they need more money.. whatever .... I am addicted to cigarettes, however I am aware that the government hooks you on them so that they can get more tax money out of you...

The definition of invasion of privacy

RELATED ARTICLE

Feel uncomfortable being video taped everywhere you go?

Now you have something new to look forward to... airport scanners that can read your body language, and polygraph you with nothing more then 2 cameras and some sensors... no wires needed...

If this contraption flags you, then you have the pleasure of being interviewed in front of a camera that will detect if you are lying..

First it sounds like too much of an invasion of privacy, especially when facial recognition software is no doubt another part of this security system, so that they can keep a profile of you in there systems, and track your movements...

And secondly, it seems like it is putting too much of our security into machines. These machines have to cost a shit load of money, and ANY computer system can be tricked...

This is going to provide A LOT of FALSE POSITIVES, and most likely will not effectively stop anyone, as I am sure there will be much "test runs" by those wanting to learn how to beat the machine.

It is also going to make the screeners less vigilante in there job, as they will let the machine pick the people to interview.

The money for screening will go to this new sophisticated equiptment, and the salary of the screeners will actually go down, as they will need less training, just training on how to use the machine, and trust its judgment...

A better alternitive would be to provide better training, and resources to the screeners in order for them to do a more effective and efficient job. And to provide them with better pay, and benifits. A well trained and experienced person is more effective than any machine.
RELATED ARTICLE

nuclear only for US...

Seems like when it comes to nuclear power, or weapons, its more of a do what WE say, not what WE do... the WE being the US government...

Why are we the only ones responsible enough to enrich uranium for nuclear power, or the only ones that are able to stockpile nuclear weapons?

Why? Because if anyone else obtains the technology then we will not be the big bully, or controller of the world. We will have someone with the ability to stand up to our governments bullying practices..

We should not attempt to stop countries from seeking to use nuclear power. While there may be dangers involved with accidents, we should instead work with other countries so that they can safely produce nuclear power, which is green power for all you pussy environ-mental people.. but it is also renewable, and cheap power...

If we all work together to share the technologies that we have instead of trying to limit certain technologies only to US and our friends, then there will always be tension between countries, and wars..

I dont know this one is just a rant.. no points here I guess...

Licenced to kill...

RELATED ARTICLE

A killer cop had his sentence overturned... Wow... if this guy was not a cop do you think that the decision would be overturned??

The article states that the person who was killed was fighting over a parking spot with the pigs father, when the guy grabbed a baseball bat and smacked his father with it several times... granted this is assault with a deadly weapon, but the pig, I assume off duty at the time, shot the guy in the head while the bat was still in the guys hand....

First off, the article says the bat was still in the guys hand, not that the guy continued to strike the pigs father...

Secondly, the article lacks info on if the guy was hitting the pigs father in the head or body, which is very important information that is missing. If he was swinging at the head, then it could be assumed that the fathers life was in mortal danger...

Third, I am sure that just brandishing the gun and announcing yourself as a pig would be enough to have the guy take a step back and put the bat down, if not, then a shot to the knee or other non fatal area would have been enough. The officers life was no way in mortal danger, and the use of deadly force was not justified, and therefore he should spend the remainder of his sentence behind bars, and bent over in front of bubba...

Thursday, September 18, 2008

HOLY SHIT!!

You can read the article just below this one about the government buying the insurance company AIG, but I was just reviewing my past posts, and came across this one
http://dementedmyndz.blogspot.com/2008/06/lets-give-up-more-freedoms.html
all I can say is HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!

So the government now OWNS AIG insurance... The insurance companies want to install this GPS tracker device into your car to make sure you are a safe driver, and obey speed limits, and traffic laws (and where you are, so they can eventually feed you location based ads, or charge you a higher rate based on where you drive)....
Now, with out the need for a warrant, the government can track your movements... no need for excessive expenses on cameras on highways with license plate reading software (which is at every toll booth, so even with out EZ-pass, your coming and going's are tracked)... they can just tap into your GPS and know where ever you are going, or where ever you have gone... no need for a warrant, because you are there customer, and I am sure that they will require you to sign some type of waiver, hidden deep in the fine print....

Just a nightmarish thought... I will let you get back to what you were doing...

the USA corporation

It seemed for a while that the corporations were controlling the government... but it seems now that the government in itself is becoming one big corporation.

The government just bought AIG insurance.. one of the nations largest insurance companies. Along with there recent take overs of the mortgage companies, it seems like the government is gaining more control thru owning corporations... So why is this a bad idea? Well, you can view my rants about when they took over Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac... but now are they not only in control of who can get a mortgage, and at what rate, they can also control what your insurance premiums are, and what the pay outs will be for insurance claims.

They talk about how they do not want to have "socialized health care" also known as universal health care - a right that should be available to every living being... yet, they take control of these corporations like some sort of communist dictatorship.

Not only are your rising property and sales taxes going to the government, along with fines, surcharges, permit fees, etc... but now the interest on your mortgage, and your insurance premiums are also going to the government...

While you may have had a possibility to be gouged by your previous insurance carrier, or mortgage bank, there were at least some form of checks and balances, the private company's operated under the laws of the government, and the laws supposedly should have provided some sense of consumer protections, while still allowing the companies to make a profit, without gouging the consumer, or operating there business with unfair tactics.

Now that those who write the laws are in control of these companies where is the checks and balances. The same people who regulate these industries, must also make these companies profitable for the government! Do you believe that they will pass legislation that will be favorable to the consumer, or favorable to the governments need for more money to fuel the "war on its citizens".... oops... I meant to say "war on terrorism"

You will forever be indebted to your government, and I would not doubt that in the near future they will criminalize defaulting on your mortgage, or insurance payments. Prisoners equal free, or very cheap labor. They will need lots of free, or very cheap labor to operate the corporate branch of the government!

I wonder what the next corporate purchace of the US government is going to be? Will it be the media? Telecommunications companies? The Automotive industry?

Sunday, September 14, 2008

can a bitch really win the election?

So at first I thought the democrats fucked them self by having the first black and first female candidates run against each other. And the battle was a long one, and did divide the democratic party.

But the democratic party got there shit together, and seem to be all on the same page now. The smart thing is that Obama choose a running mate that was strong in the areas where he was weak... What did the republicans to? They just found any bitch that they could to try to get the Hillary votes away from the democrats.

Umm... choosing a bitch for your running mate is not going to get you any democrat voters... and in fact, looks like that shit may back fire on your ass... Your candidate should be chosen based on what they can bring to your campaign. Just because you picked a chick does not mean that people will vote for your ass... so I amend my previous prediction, and say that the democrats will win the white house...

Now if Bush will give up the white house to the democrats as scheduled is another story.. I am sure that he will find something that warrants the enactment of the presidential order that he passed into law stating that in the event of a national emergency the current administration can remain in power for an undetermined amount of time...

Illegal phone taps

This is old news... but still important none the less....

Almost every telephone company, with the exception of Quest (I believe) allowed illegal wiretapping to be done to there customers under the direction of the FBI and other government agencies, at the order of president bush.

ALL of these companies broke the law... however, since it was at the will of the president, they were all granted retroactive immunity shielding them of any responsibility, or civil suits.

DO NOT TRUST TELEPHONE or INTERNET communications as secure!!! Regardless of the laws, they do not apply to telecommunications providers, when the government tells them to break the law.

Treat every telephone and internet communication as if the government, or telephone company is intercepting your communication.

When you must communicate by telephone and do not want to be entrapped try to do so with pay phones, or disposable prepaid cellular phones... I could provide what I believe to be the most secure method of this, however I can and will not for 2 reasons... first, if I ever need to communicate in this way, the evidence would be posted clearly here for them to locate my communications, and secondly, If I provided a detailed way to do this, It would not work too good, because not only would you have the information, but so would those trying to intercept your communications..

Govermnent ownership of debt

fannie mae and freddie mac have been taken over by the government... supposedly in order to protect us from the current mortgage crisis. Laws and regulations preventing predatory lending practices should have been enacted a long time ago, and adjustable rate mortgages should not be legal.


While the banking industries own the country, and even to some degree control or own the government, they are private companies (or publicly traded, whatever thats not the point)... and as such companies are in business to make money, they should not be taken over by the government when times get tough. This is not a communist country. If a business is in trouble, then that business will be sold, be closed, or go bankrupt. There is no reason for the government to step in and take over control of a private company, regardless of what industry it is in.

It is bad enough that the government charges you property taxes, where if you fail to pay they can seize your property for back taxes. They also have been using eminent domain to steal property from its rightful owners. And in many cases not for public works projects, as should be, but for commercial interests.

Giving the government control over the two major underwriters for most of the mortgages in the country is putting too much power and oversight into the hands of the government.

Now the government is the one who will get to choose if you get a mortgage, and for how much. They will have more information about your personal finances then perhaps you were willing to share with them, more so if you are self employed or work off the books and are not giving your fair share to the IRS.

The worst part of this situation however, in my mind, is now when property is foreclosed on, the government takes ownership of that property. Now they do not need to come up with eminent domain excuses to steal property from under you, all they need to do is adjust the interest rate on your ARM mortgage so that you are unable to afford the monthly payment any longer, and take the property from you.

What would be a better way to resolve this problem? First, as they are private companies, they should work to resolve the financial troubles that there companies face. They could seek to merge the two companies, they could call in all overdue debts owed to them... the government could even offer short term low interest loans to these companies to keep them afloat. The government take over of these companies however, is unamerican, and should NOT ever occur.

Friday, August 22, 2008

Sorry for the absence of posts

I had a video card die on me... and while I have many other computers around the house, they are all set up for special purposes, such as streaming audio/video to all of the TVs around the house... at the same time I was out of the house for about 20 hours a day, working then helping someone rewire there house. So I was unable to post on here.. I have seen many articles that I wanted to vent on here about, but was not able to... hopefully I will be able to get back to at least 2 updates or more per week going forward...

You are NOT responsible for ANYTHING.... EVER!!

I am getting a little tired of hearing the commercials on the radio..... "Are you overweight? It may not be your fault." "Bad credit? It's not your fault!"

Well when do people get to take responsibilities for there actions?

While there is a small percentage of fat people who are fat because of an existing medical condition, a majority of fat people just eat too much, and are too lazy to get off there ass and do some physical activities. Most fat people have a medical condition BECAUSE they are fat, not the other way around... stop eating so goddamn much, and get off the couch every once and a while and take a walk around the corner, and you won't be such a big fat ass any more...

As for having bad credit... which I have had before... It IS your fault... if you are spending more then you can afford, chances are that you are going to fall on your ass financially, and be in debt, with no way to repay what you owe. Either start learning how to live within the means that your employment pays you, or get a higher paying job, or another job in addition to the job that you have. Yes things are costing more now then they used to... but guess what, the price of things will always go up, and so will the amount of money people are paid... If you are a skilled worker, you can make sure that you are at the top of your field, stay current on what is going on in your industry, and demand the highest wages for your job title.

What is going to be next? "Run a red light and get into a car accident? Its not your fault...." Oppps! I am sorry insurance is provided as "no-fault" so I guess you aren't at fault... and the insurance companies do not like the word accident... they would prefer that you called them collisions, because a collision is avoidable, an accident just happens... not like someone is going to collide with you on purpose, although it has happened before... there are some crazy ass mother fuckers out there...

So people... take responsibilities for your actions... only you can define who you are.

Oh one last note... for the fatties out there... the human body can not digest corn.. but eating it will fill you just as any other food... so it obviously takes more calories to eat then it provides to you... think about it....

Sunday, July 20, 2008

"White flight"?? WTF is the media so racist for

RELATED ARTICLE

The above story on the link is a NON STORY. It is a waste of ink (I can say ink, because more then likely The Wall Street Journal published this in print as well)

Our country is made up of all races, and nationalities. What is the point in discussing where people move from race to race?

So more white people are moving into cities, and less black people are staying, or the percentages are shifting. SO WHAT? What makes this a newsworthy story? What prevents this article from being racist?

Instead of black people moving in and saying "here goes the neighborhood", this article is saying just about the opposite, whites are moving in and you are saying "here comes the neighborhood", which is just as racist.

Businesses need to remain fluid, and dynamic. The article says how stores who once catered to minority needs are seeing there business dwindle, or evaporate completely. Do not blame this on the population around the business changing, blame this instead on the business for failing to have a fluid business plan, that can change to accommodate the needs of the surrounding community.

Is the music industry, movie industry, film developing industry, or any other industry hurt by the advancement of technology able to sit back and blame someone else for there failure to have a fluid business model, to adjust with time, or are they working hard to change the business model to match the needs of the customers?

What is a minority anyways? We live in America. Everyone is here. Everyone is welcome. I do not see colors, or races when I walk down the street, or enter into a business. I do not care if the owner of a business is black, white, asian, or anything else for that matter. All I care about is if the business that I frequent has the products and services that I am seeking, for a fair and reasonable price.

Guns for cash follow up (part 2)

RELATED ARTICLE

It looks like this program is a sham. Of the 2 people identified in the article turning guns over, it appeared as if they were legal guns. One person with 3 shotguns used for hunting from Staten Island, and a pastor, whose mother brought a gun with her from Florida when she moved up to NY, hardly the street criminals that this program was intended to get guns from.

Also many people complained that it took nearly 2 hours for the guns to be collected from them... perhaps this was so that the covert surveillance teams could gather intel on the people and take photos, run background checks, etc.

The payments were made with pre-paid debit cards, which could be used in stores, or at ATM machines. This is another security risk to the people who handed guns over. Every ATM has a video camera, so anyone withdrawing cash will be videotaped. Anyone using these cards as credit cards should just as well call up the local police station and tell them there location, and what they are buying, because this information will be recorded, and kept on file.

So lets say that you returned one of these guns, and got your gift card. You were photographed while you waited. Your photo was matched up with police records/DMV records, and a background check was run on you. Now if a gun crime occurs near anywhere where you use this gift card you will become the #1 suspect.

I suggest for all those who did participate in this program, the first thing that you should have done was to go to the nearest ATM to the drop off point and withdraw all of the money on the card. - The problem with that tho - most ATMs will charge you a fee, so you will never get your full $200... so what a scam it is indeed....